flowchart TD
subgraph INPUT["INPUT"]
WIRE["Wire 1.6 mm diameter<br/>from drawing line"]
end
subgraph WAAM_CELL["WAAM CELL"]
ROBOT["6-axis robot"]
TORCH["Welding torch"]
ARC["Electric arc<br/>~5000C"]
FLUX["Flux shielding<br/>FCAW-S"]
TABLE["Rotary table"]
end
subgraph POST["POST-PROCESSING"]
GRIND["Abrasive<br/>grinding"]
FINISH["Finishing"]
end
subgraph OUTPUT["OUTPUT"]
PARTS["Finished parts<br/>bodies, frames, brackets"]
end
WIRE --> ROBOT
ROBOT --> TORCH
TORCH --> ARC
FLUX --> ARC
ARC --> TABLE
TABLE --> GRIND
GRIND --> FINISH
FINISH --> PARTS
style INPUT fill:#f0e68c
style WAAM_CELL fill:#fff3cd
style POST fill:#d4edda
style OUTPUT fill:#cce5ff
WAAM: Metal 3D Printing
TL;DR
- Technology: Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (wire deposition by arc)
- Material: Wire 1.6-2.0 mm diameter (Al, Fe from rolling mill)
- Productivity: ~60-180 kg/day (3 cells) for complex parts
- Application: Robot bodies, brackets, frames, tooling
Overview
WAAM is a metal 3D printing technology where a robotic arm melts wire with an electric arc and deposits material layer by layer. It is an industrial alternative to powder-based 3D printing, faster and more economical.
Operating Principle
Process: 1. Robot feeds wire to the torch 2. Electric arc melts the wire (and workpiece surface) 3. Molten droplet solidifies, forming deposited layer 4. Robot moves 1-2 mm, deposits next layer 5. Layer by layer the part grows
WAAM Cell
Robotic Arm
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | 6-axis industrial robot |
| Payload | 10-20 kg (torch + wire) |
| Positioning accuracy | +/-0.1 mm |
| Travel speed | 0.5-2 m/s |
| Material | Steel Fe + Al (local production) |
Difference from Earth robots: Lightweight Al construction (low gravity 0.38g), no lubrication (operates in 0.1 atm O₂).
Welding Torch
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | FCAW-S (Flux-Cored Arc Welding — Self-shielded) |
| Current | 150-300 A |
| Voltage | 20-30 V |
| Power | 3-9 kW |
| Wire feed | 3-8 m/min |
| Wire | Flux-cored with flux core (TiO₂+CaO+MgO+Fe) |
Why FCAW-S? - Flux creates shielding gas and slag cover when heated - No external gas required — argon is not imported - Flux components are 100% local: TiO₂ (titanium line), CaO (MRE slag), MgO (magnesite), Fe - Earth analogs: Lincoln Electric Innershield, ESAB Coreshield
Flux-cored wire production: steel strip → forming into tube → flux filling → drawing to Ø1.6-2.0 mm
Rotary Table
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Diameter | 1-2 m |
| Load capacity | 500-1000 kg |
| Rotation speed | 0.1-10 rpm |
| Tilt | +/-45 degrees |
Purpose: Allows robot to deposit complex parts by rotating them to optimal angles.
Materials for WAAM
| Material | Application | Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum (Al) | Robot bodies, brackets | ~3 t/day |
| Iron (Fe) | Frames, structural elements | ~1 t/day |
Wire source: Rolling mill (drawing line)
Productivity
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Deposition rate | 1-3 kg/hour per cell |
| Number of WAAM cells | 3 (per factory) |
| Operation | 20 hours/day |
| TOTAL | ~20-60 kg/day per cell |
| For 3 cells | ~60-180 kg/day |
Why not more? - WAAM is slower than casting but allows complex shapes without tooling - Used for parts that cannot be cast (hollow bodies, complex geometries)
Post-Processing: Abrasive Grinding
After WAAM, the part has a rough surface. Finish machining is done by grinding (not milling).
Grinding Cell
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | Centaur-M robot with abrasive head |
| Number of axes | 6 (manipulator) + rotary table |
| Drive power | 3-5 kW |
| Spindle speed | 3000-6000 rpm |
| Tool | Al₂O₃ abrasive wheels (corundum, local) |
Advantages over CNC: - No imported high-speed spindle (20,000 rpm) - Al₂O₃ abrasive produced from regolith (unlimited) - Same Centaur-M robot, just different tool - Dry machining in vacuum (no coolant)
Machining accuracy: +/-0.05 mm (sufficient for bodies and frames)
Typical Parts Produced by WAAM
| Part | Material | Mass | Print time | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crab-M body | Al | 50 kg | 20 hours | Crab-M robot |
| Centaur-M frame | Al | 30 kg | 12 hours | Centaur-M robot |
| Caster brackets | Fe | 20 kg | 8 hours | Continuous casting |
| Assembly tooling | Fe | 10 kg | 5 hours | Jigs, fixtures |
Advantages of WAAM
| Advantage | Description |
|---|---|
| No tooling | No molds, dies, casting patterns needed |
| Rapid prototyping | New part in 1 day (casting takes weeks) |
| Material savings | Only required metal used (casting has 30-50% waste) |
| Complex geometry | Cavities, internal channels, organic shapes |
WAAM Limitations
| Limitation | Solution |
|---|---|
| Low speed | Use for complex parts, simple ones by casting |
| Surface roughness | Abrasive grinding (Al₂O₃) |
| Abrasive wear | Al₂O₃ corundum — local production, replacement every 1-2 days |
Energy Consumption
| Component | Power | Quantity | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAAM cell (robot + torch) | 10 kW | 3 | 30 kW |
| Grinding cell (robot + head) | 5 kW | 2 | 10 kW |
| Exhaust ventilation | 5 kW | 1 | 5 kW |
| Automation | 5 kW | - | 5 kW |
| TOTAL | ~50 kW |
Maintenance
| Operation | Frequency | Performed by |
|---|---|---|
| Torch replacement | 1 month | Centaur-M |
| Abrasive wheel replacement | 1-2 days | Centaur-M |
| Rotary table cleaning | Daily | Crab-M |
| Robot calibration | Weekly | Automation |
Quality Control
| Parameter | Control method | Standard | Action on deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porosity | In-process monitoring (arc current, WAAM cameras) | <2% | Parameter correction |
| Dimensions | Touch probe | +/-0.1 mm | Rework by grinding |
| Cracks | Visual (Centaur-M cameras) | No visible defects | Reject |
| Hardness | Mechanical hardness tester | Per specification | Heat treatment |
See Also
- Rolling mill - wire source
- Robot assembly - main consumer of WAAM parts
- Continuous casting - alternative for simple parts
- Equipment production - tooling from WAAM